TI-USA statement to U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Citizens United v. FEC

Filed under:
Posted 26 January 2010 by Transparency International USA

The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC, which finds no difference between a corporate person and a real person and allows unlimited corporate spending in elections, may have significant negative implications for the U.S. political system as well as political finance reform efforts around the world.

TI-USA joined an amicus curiae brief submitted by Justice at Stake in the Citizens United case, arguing against Citizen United’s position and warning of the harmful impact the Court’s ruling could have on judicial selection in states in which judges are elected, which is the majority of states. The Court’s decision rejected these arguments. Citing the amicus brief in his dissent, Justice Stevens noted that “at a time when concerns about the conduct of judicial elections have reached a fever pitch . . . the Court today unleashes the floodgates of corporate and union general treasury spending in these races.”

The Court’s sweeping decision increases the likelihood that politicians will accept campaign funding from corporations in exchange for policy favors and that candidates will feel indebted to corporations that engage in large independent spending in their favor or against their opponents. Yet statutes dating back a century, as well as the Court’s own precedents, have supported the view that corporate money is a corrupting influence in politics. The Citizens United ruling will put that longstanding assumption to the test and call into question statutes in 24 states prohibiting independent expenditures by unions and corporations. The Court's decision does not explicitly overturn those laws, but they are likely to be challenged and may go unenforced in the interim. As Justice Stevens put it in his dissent, “the Court operates with a sledgehammer rather than a scalpel when it strikes down one of Congress’ most significant efforts to regulate the role that corporations and unions play in electoral politics. It compounds the offense by implicitly striking down a great many state laws as well.”

Although the Court ruled that Congress can require corporations to disclose their spending and run disclaimers with their advertisements, prompt disclosure has not yet effectively mitigated the potentially corrupting effect of money in politics.
The ruling could have an adverse impact on campaign reform efforts if the United States is perceived to backpedaling efforts to address on the corrupting influence of money in politics.

TI-USA will continue to review the opinions in the case and diverging views on its potential impact.

Press contact(s):

E: .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

Tags:

Stay informed

Related news

27
Feb
2014

Launch of new global campaign to stop secret government contracting

Today sees the launch of a new global campaign, Stop Secret Contracts, calling on world leaders to end secrecy in public contracting. The campaign is ...

24
Feb
2014

NEW AUTHORITIES MUST PROVE THAT INTEGRITY IS NOT A MERE SLOGAN

Transparency International Ukraine warmly congratulates the Maidan protesters on their victory in the fight for the right of Ukrainian people to live ...

21
Feb
2014

Transparency International ready to partner with government in fighting corruption

Transparency International welcomes the commitment expressed by the President to partner with the organisation in the fight against corruption.

Related publications

Publication cover image

Sierra Leone National Integrity System Assessment 2013

The 2013 Sierra Leone National Integrity System (NIS) Assessment finds in particular that Parliament and the Judiciary are weak in checking the ...

National Integrity System assessment published – Dec 2013

Publication cover image

New Zealand National Integrity System Assessment 2013

The 2013 New Zealand National Integrity System (NIS) Assessment finds that New Zealand’s national integrity system remains fundamentally strong. ...

National Integrity System assessment published – Dec 2013